Qualcomm · Filed Nov 15, 2024 · Published May 21, 2026 · verified — real USPTO data

Qualcomm Patents an ML-Driven System for Predicting Chip Test Results

Testing a chip thoroughly takes time — and time on a test floor costs money. Qualcomm's new patent describes a way to let machine learning predict what a full test would find, so you don't always have to run it.

Qualcomm Patent: ML-Based Integrated Circuit Testing — figure from US 2026/0141148 A1
FIG. 1A — rendered from the official USPTO publication PDF.
Publication number US 2026/0141148 A1
Applicant QUALCOMM Incorporated
Filing date Nov 15, 2024
Publication date May 21, 2026
Inventors Sanket Vinod THAKUR, Enrique DE LA ROSA, Lindsey Makana KOSTAS
CPC classification 716/136
Grant likelihood Medium
Examiner CENTRAL, DOCKET (Art Unit OPAP)
Status Docketed New Case - Ready for Examination (Dec 18, 2024)
Document 20 claims

What Qualcomm's ML chip testing system actually does

Imagine you're baking a batch of cookies and instead of tasting every single one, you check a few key indicators — color, texture, smell — and confidently predict which ones are done. Qualcomm's patent applies a similar shortcut to chip manufacturing.

When a chip rolls off the production line, engineers run a battery of tests to catch defects. Some of those tests are expensive and time-consuming. This patent proposes training a machine learning model on historical test data so it can predict what a specific test would show, based on the results of tests you've already run.

The upshot: you feed the ML model your existing test data, it generates a predicted test data set, and that prediction is compared against a known target to decide if the chip passes or fails — potentially without running every test from scratch.

How the predictive model maps test data to outcomes

The system works in three main steps:

  • Collect actual test data — the IC is put through a subset of tests, generating a real dataset of measurements and results.
  • Run a predictive ML model — at least one machine learning model, trained to be a proxy for a specific target test, takes that actual data as input and produces a predicted test data set. Think of this model as a learned surrogate: it has internalized patterns from thousands of prior chip test runs to estimate what a particular test would have found.
  • Determine pass/fail status — the predicted data is compared against a target result (the expected outcome for a passing chip) to produce a final test result status.

The claim is deliberately broad: the ML model is described as a predictive model associated with a first test, meaning the architecture could accommodate many test types across different IC designs. The patent doesn't lock in a specific ML algorithm, leaving room for regression models, neural networks, or ensemble methods.

Notably, the method is processor-implemented, suggesting it's designed to run inline — potentially on test equipment itself — rather than as a separate offline analytics step.

What this means for chip manufacturing costs and yield

Chip testing is one of the less-glamorous but very real cost drivers in semiconductor manufacturing. Running a full suite of tests on every die adds up, especially at high volume. If an ML model can reliably skip or compress certain tests by predicting their outcomes from earlier results, that translates directly into faster throughput and lower per-unit cost — advantages that matter a lot when you're producing billions of chips a year like Qualcomm.

For consumers, this kind of efficiency improvement doesn't show up as a feature — it shows up as lower manufacturing costs and potentially better yield management. It also fits into a broader industry trend of using AI not just in chips, but in the processes that make them.

Editorial take

This is unglamorous but genuinely useful engineering work. Reducing test time through ML prediction is a real problem the semiconductor industry cares about, and Qualcomm filing in this space signals they're investing in AI-assisted manufacturing — not just AI-powered products. That said, the patent's claims are broad and fairly abstract, so its real value will depend entirely on how well the underlying models perform on actual production lines.

Get one Big Tech patent every Sunday

Plain English, intelligent commentary, no hype. Free.

Source. Full patent text and figures from the official USPTO publication PDF.

Editorial commentary on a publicly published patent application. Not legal advice.