IBM · Filed Jan 21, 2025 · Published Jul 23, 2026 · verified — real USPTO data

IBM Patents a Method to Untangle Complex Chip Pulses and Catch Timing Errors

Designing a chip that runs at the wrong speed is a costly mistake. IBM has filed a patent for a smarter way to check whether a chip's internal timing is correct, focusing on a type of clock signal that fires twice per cycle instead of once.

IBM Patent: Dual-Edge Pulse Clock Modeling for Chip Testing — figure from US 2026/0212098 A1
Figure from the official USPTO publication.
Publication number US 2026/0212098 A1
Applicant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Filing date Jan 21, 2025
Publication date Jul 23, 2026
Inventors Manish Verma, Michael Hemsley Wood, Kerim Kalafala, Hemlata Gupta
CPC classification 716/100
Grant likelihood Medium
Examiner CENTRAL, DOCKET (Art Unit OPAP)
Status Docketed New Case - Ready for Examination (Feb 26, 2025)
Document 25 claims

How IBM's clock-splitting method helps chip designers

Imagine a metronome that taps on both the downbeat and the upbeat, not just one or the other. Some chips use a similar trick with their internal clock signal, firing a data pulse on both the rising and falling edges of each clock tick. That's called a dual-edge pulse clock, and it lets chips pack more work into every cycle.

The problem is that chip design software often struggles to analyze these double-firing clocks accurately during testing. IBM's patent describes a method that takes one complex dual-edge clock and splits it into two simpler, standard clock signals for analysis purposes: one representing the pulses on the rising edge, and one representing the pulses on the falling edge.

By modeling the clock this way, timing analysis tools can check whether data is arriving where it needs to go, exactly when it needs to get there, without getting confused by the double-firing behavior. It's a behind-the-scenes fix for chip design software, not a consumer product.

How the dual-clock model captures both pulse edges

The patent covers a computer-implemented method for static timing analysis (the process of verifying that every signal in a chip design arrives at the right place within its allowed time window).

The specific problem it targets is the dual-edge pulse clock: a clock signal that generates short pulses on both the leading edge (the moment the clock signal rises from low to high) and the trailing edge (the moment it falls back to low). Standard timing tools are built around clocks that fire on only one edge, so dual-edge clocks can confuse them or require special handling that existing tools don't support well.

IBM's method works in two steps:

  • Identification: The system reads the circuit's specification file and detects when a dual-edge pulse clock is derived from a base source clock.
  • Modeling: It replaces that single complex clock with a pair of simpler clock signals, one to represent the leading-edge pulses and one to represent the trailing-edge pulses, so standard timing analysis tools can process each independently.

The end result is that timing analysis software can verify the chip's timing behavior correctly without needing to be rebuilt from scratch to handle dual-edge clocks.

What this means for chip design verification tools

For chip design teams, incorrect timing analysis means bugs that only show up after a chip is manufactured, which is extremely expensive to fix. Tools that can't correctly model dual-edge pulse clocks may either miss timing violations or flag false errors, both of which cost engineering time and money.

This patent is aimed squarely at electronic design automation (EDA) software, the tools companies use to verify chip designs before sending them to a fab. IBM has a long history in chip design tooling and this kind of filing is typical of incremental improvements to verification workflows. It won't appear in a consumer product, but it could surface inside IBM's internal design tools or in commercial EDA software.

Editorial take

This is a narrow, incremental fix to a specific problem in chip timing analysis software. It's not a broad platform play or a signal of strategic direction. If you work in EDA or chip verification, it's worth a look; if you don't, you can safely skip it.

Which company should we read for you?

We track 17 companies here. Pro is the same weekly breakdown for any company you choose, delivered privately. Type a name and we'll scope it and send you a quote.

Get one Big Tech patent every Sunday

Plain English, intelligent commentary, no hype. Free.

Source. Full patent text and figures from the official USPTO publication PDF.

Editorial commentary on a publicly published patent application. Not legal advice.