New Google Patents · Filed Oct 25, 2024 · Published Jul 2, 2026 · verified — real USPTO data

Google Patents an AI That Pre-Builds Ads, Then Filters Them to Fit Your Preferences

Google is patenting a system where an AI generates a pool of ad candidates before any user request arrives, then narrows that pool using both platform-level rules and individual user preferences before deciding what to actually show.

Google Patent: AI Ad Filtering With User Preferences — figure from US 2026/0187155 A1
FIG. 1A — rendered from the official USPTO publication PDF.
Publication number US 2026/0187155 A1
Applicant Google LLC
Filing date Oct 25, 2024
Publication date Jul 2, 2026
Inventors Xiaohang Li, Sikun Lin, Yang Yang
CPC classification 707/732
Grant likelihood Medium
Examiner HALM, KWEKU WILLIAM (Art Unit 2166)
Status Non Final Action Mailed (Jun 4, 2026)
Parent application is a National Stage Entry of PCTUS2023034167 (filed 2023-09-29)
Document 20 claims

How Google's pre-generated ad filtering actually works

Imagine a restaurant that pre-cooks a dozen dishes every morning, then figures out what to serve you based on your allergies and the daily specials board. That's the rough idea here. Instead of generating an ad from scratch the moment you load a page, Google's system would produce a batch of options ahead of time.

When you actually visit a page or trigger a search, the system cross-references that pre-built pool against two things: rules tied to the specific context (think platform policies or content category restrictions) and your personal preferences, which can block certain types of content you've told the system you don't want to see.

The output is a single ad (or other "digital component," in patent language) that survives both filters. The goal appears to be speed and relevance at the same time, since the heavy generation work is done before your request even arrives.

Inside Google's two-stage candidate and filter pipeline

The patent describes a two-phase approach to generating what it calls digital components (a broad term covering ads, content cards, or similar media units).

  • Phase 1 (pre-generation): Before any user query arrives, a machine learning model generates one or more candidate digital components from input data. This front-loads the expensive AI generation step so it doesn't slow down real-time response.
  • Phase 2 (filtering): When a query does arrive, the system identifies two constraint sets: digital component regulations tied to the query context (platform rules, content category limits, legal restrictions) and user preference data that blocks certain content types at the individual level.
  • Selection and output: The system finds candidates that satisfy both constraint sets and generates a final output component from the surviving candidate(s).

The separation between generation and filtering is the architectural choice worth noticing. Most ad systems do both steps in real time. By splitting them, Google's system can potentially serve more contextually tuned results faster, while still honoring user-level restrictions that were set in advance.

What this means for ad personalization and user control

For everyday users, this patent hints at a system where your stated content preferences (say, opting out of a category of ads) could be enforced at a structural level, not just as a post-hoc filter that sometimes fails. The pre-generation step also means the AI has more time to produce higher-quality candidates instead of rushing one out under time pressure.

For Google's business, the bigger implication is efficiency. Generating AI-driven ad content at scale in real time is expensive. A pre-generation cache that gets filtered per request could reduce that cost significantly, while the two-layer filtering (platform rules plus user preferences) gives the system a defensible answer to regulators asking how it handles restricted content categories.

Editorial take

This is a genuinely interesting infrastructure patent because it separates a problem most ad systems treat as one step into two cleaner stages. The user-preference angle is the part worth watching: if Google actually surfaces this as a user-facing control, it could become a meaningful privacy and consent feature rather than just an engineering optimization.

Which company should we read for you?

We track 17 companies here. Pro is the same weekly breakdown for any company you choose, delivered privately. Type a name and we'll scope it and send you a quote.

Get one Big Tech patent every Sunday

Plain English, intelligent commentary, no hype. Free.

Source. Full patent text and figures from the official USPTO publication PDF.

Editorial commentary on a publicly published patent application. Not legal advice.