New Google Patents · Filed Jun 30, 2025 · Published Jul 30, 2026 · verified — real USPTO data

Google Patents a Ranking System That Scores Search Results With One Predictive Value Per Item

Google is patenting a more efficient way to rank search results, one that learns a shared scoring grid and then adjusts each item with a single number rather than computing everything from scratch per query.

Google Patent: Learning-to-Rank via Ordinal Regression — figure from US 2026/0220481 A1
Figure from the official USPTO publication.
See all 15 drawings from this filing ↓
Publication number US 2026/0220481 A1
Applicant Google LLC
Filing date Jun 30, 2025
Publication date Jul 30, 2026
Inventors Gil Shamir
CPC classification 706/25
Grant likelihood Low
Examiner CENTRAL, DOCKET (Art Unit OPAP)
Status Docketed New Case - Ready for Examination (Apr 27, 2026)
Parent application is a National Stage Entry of PCTUS2022054359 (filed 2022-12-30)
Document 21 claims

How Google's ordinal ranking system sorts results

Imagine Google has to sort millions of web pages every time you search. Today's ranking systems can be expensive because they essentially re-score every page independently. This patent describes a method where the system first learns a shared set of quality thresholds (like grade boundaries), and then for each page it only has to calculate one small nudge value to place that page on the scale.

Think of it like a ruler that doesn't change, and the system just measures where each result lands on that ruler. That simplicity makes training faster and the predictions more consistent.

The patent also covers ways to make the system learn from comparisons (which result is better than another) and from lists of results all at once, and it includes a temperature knob that lets the model decide how certain or spread-out its predictions should be.

Inside the shared threshold grid and shift parameter

The patent describes a machine-learning approach called relaxed ordinal regression for ranking. Ordinal regression (a method for predicting ordered categories, like star ratings or quality tiers) normally requires the model to learn separate boundary values for every level. This system instead learns a single shared grid of thresholds across all training data, then predicts just one shift parameter per example, sliding the grid to produce a probability distribution over labels.

Three loss functions (the formulas that tell the model how wrong it is during training) are covered:

  • Pointwise loss, scores each result on its own
  • Pairwise loss, compares two results and learns which should rank higher
  • Listwise loss, evaluates an entire ranked list at once

The patent also describes distillation (having a large, expensive model teach a smaller, faster model to mimic its rankings) for both pointwise and ranking scenarios.

A temperature parameter is added across all settings. Temperature controls how peaked or spread the prediction distribution is, allowing the model to produce a single confident answer when the data supports it (unimodal) or a more spread-out answer when uncertainty is warranted (multimodal).

What this means for Google Search result quality

Search ranking is the core of Google's business, and small improvements in how results are ordered at scale translate directly to better user experience and higher advertiser value. A method that reduces the computational cost of training ranking models, while also supporting pairwise and listwise comparison signals, could make it cheaper to iterate on Search quality or to deploy ranking in resource-constrained settings like on-device search.

For you as a searcher, the practical implication is that Google's results could become more consistently ordered and the system easier to retrain on new data. The distillation component also suggests Google wants to compress large ranking models into smaller ones without losing accuracy, which matters for mobile and edge deployments.

Editorial take

This is a solid machine-learning methods patent covering a real technical problem in search ranking, but it's squarely in the category of infrastructure work that improves the plumbing rather than changing what Search looks like. It's worth tracking if you follow ML ranking research, but it won't change anything a user would directly notice.

The drawings

15 drawing sheets from US 2026/0220481 A1 · click any drawing to enlarge

Patent filing page

Which company should we read for you?

We track 17 companies here. Pro is the same weekly breakdown for any company you choose, delivered privately. Type a name and we'll scope it and send you a quote.

Get one Big Tech patent every Sunday

Plain English, intelligent commentary, no hype. Free.

Source. Full patent text and figures from the official USPTO publication PDF.

Editorial commentary on a publicly published patent application. Not legal advice.